Barriers Associated with the Proposed Interventions
Order a Barriers Associated with the Proposed Interventions paper today!
Various factors act as a roadblock to successfully implementing the proposed interventions. The first barrier is the lack of support from the primary care providers. These providers might resist changes, thus making it hard to achieve the objective. The other barrier is the lack of support from the management, especially concerning the provision of the required resources (Purvis, 2018). The patient’s resistance to the proposed new treatment interventions is the other challenge.
Resources Required
The first resource is the glucometer that will be used to measure fasting blood sugar. The other resource is the notebook, where the data collected will be recorded to monitor the patients’ progress in blood glucose control. A clock or a watch will also be required to guide the patients and providers on the specific time that food should be taken (Vitale & Kim, 2020). Other resources include drinking water, tea, coffee, and other non-caloric beverages.
Sequence of the events and activities to be implemented
The first step is the collection of the baseline data, i.e., the records of the blood sugar readings before implementing the IF. The collected data will guide on whether there is an improvement or positive changes made by the proposed intervention. The next step is to inform the patients and providers about the proposed intervention of the IF and how it is likely to improve blood sugar management. The providers are also informed about each role in the implementation process. This procedure is crucial since it aims to reduce the resistance level. The next step is the implementation process that involves fasting, whereby patients have fasting time and eating window. For a start, they can start with 12 hours fast, have a 12-hour eating window, and then build up to a 16:8 schedule. From there, patients then transition to a smaller eating window. During the implementation, the fasting blood sugar readings are taken and compared to the previous reading before implementation to determine whether there is a positive change or improvement.