SCI 240 American University Oceanography Questions
Oceanography Discussion
The migration of sea predators is the key issue discussed in the articles. Notably, sea predators move across several geopolitical boundaries during the migration period. Some of these predators include the Pacific Bluefin Tuna, Leatherback sea turtles, Sooty Shearwaters, and even the white sharks (Harrison et al., 2018). Some of the critical factors leading to migration include bleeding and foraging. In this process, predators are faced with various challenges like illegal fishing and pollution from various environmental. The technological techniques used to track the sea predators during their process of migration are also hinted. Oceanography entails an extensive discussion of all the elements, features, and activities that take place in an ocean. The articles present the movement of various sea creatures from one region to the other. These assigned readings relate to the bigger topic or field in many various ways. Just to mention, oceanography entails the study of the biological, physical, and chemical elements of the ocean. Furthermore, it includes the study of the prevailing trends such as migration of ocean creatures and its general condition (“Ocean animals are global citizens”, 2020). Since the given readings discuss the movement of the sea predators, some of the reasons leading to their migration as well as the challenges they face in the process; they related to the bigger topic or field, which is oceanography. The chemical and physical compositions of the ocean are vital aspects of oceanography as they play a key role in making future decisions and measures. The infographic content presented below relates to the topic as it indicates some sea predator activities which take place in the ocean. Notably, the infographic content shows the migration pattern of a turtle and the key factors that contribute to its movement in the sea. These are some of the key aspects which are looked into the broader topic, oceanography. (“Sea Turtle Infographic | Sea turtle, Marine animals, Turtle love”, 2020) Some of the questions I would ask the speaker include: 1. How long do the sea predators take in other countries? 2. How can the movement of these predators be minimized in the future? 3. Which measures can be incorporated to minimize illegal fishing? References Harrison, A. L., Costa, D. P., Winship, A. J., Benson, S. R., Bograd, S. J., Antolos, M., … & Kohin, S. (2018). The political biogeography of migratory marine predators. Nature ecology & evolution, 2(10), 1571-1578. Sea Turtle Infographic | Sea turtle, Marine animals, Turtle love. (2020). Retrieved 5 April 2020, from https://www.pinterest.com/pin/858498747688683192/ Ocean animals are global citizens. (2020). Retrieved 5 April https://natureecoevocommunity.nature.com/users/173593-autumn-lynnharrison/posts/38416-ocean-animals-are-global-citizens 2020, from
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Posting | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||