Vanier College Ecological Footprint Paper

  • Post category:Nursing
  • Reading time:9 mins read
  • Post author:

Vanier College Ecological Footprint Paper

Nursing homework help

Assignment: Ecological Footprint Listen # ” 2022-06-09, 12:05 PM ! out of 35 Assignment: Ecological Footprint Our ecological footprint is a way to measure the impact humans have on the natural environment. Every day, millions of Canadians drive their vehicles to work, school, or entertainment venues, but this creates greenhouse gases and consumes non-renewable resources. These behaviours, and many other consumption habits, all contribute to our ecological footprint. Many experts believe that we are consuming more resources each year than the Earth can produce. Instructions Your task is to explore the relationships that exist among population growth, personal consumption, technological development, and our ecological footprint and write an opinion paper based on your findings. You may choose one of the topics below to analyse. However, if you have a related topic of particular interest to you, notify your teacher of the details before you proceed. Part I: Planning Your Research Paper 1. Create a plan or outline for your paper that includes your thesis and the https://lms.virtualhighschool.com/content/vhs3/departments/sci/co…?d2lSessionVal=LIIX3NmNrvZaSpKany6scCwO1&ou=64871&d2l_body_type=3 Page 1 of 4 Assignment: Ecological Footprint 2022-06-09, 12:05 PM three main points you intend to present in support of your thesis. 2. Submit a list of three resources you wish to use to write your paper. Ensure your resources are listed in APA style . 3. Submit your completed research paper outline to the Assignment: Ecological Footprint—Outline Dropbox. Your teacher will review and provide you feedback on how to proceed with your research paper. Possible Topics The use of the Living Planet Index (LPI) in assessing ecological footprint. ! Effect of planned obsolescence of electronic devices and appliances on ecological footprint. ! Effect of rapid population growth in the suburbs on local environments. ! Environmental impact of using packaged infant formula in place of breastfeeding. ! Below are a couple of links to sites that may help you in organizing your ! opinion paper. If you have any questions, please contact your teacher. Important Your grade is linked to both parts of the assignment. Wait for feedback from your teacher on the components of Part I before working on and completing your research paper. Part II: Writing Your Research Paper 1. Write your research paper, incorporating the feedback and direction from your teacher. Your research paper should have an introduction, body, and https://lms.virtualhighschool.com/content/vhs3/departments/sci/co…?d2lSessionVal=LIIX3NmNrvZaSpKany6scCwO1&ou=64871&d2l_body_type=3 Page 2 of 4 Assignment: Ecological Footprint 2022-06-09, 12:05 PM conclusion. Typically, you would have one paragraph for each of your introduction and conclusion. The body of your research paper can have multiple paragraphs. The focus of the body of your paper should be the three main points you submitted to your your teacher in Part I . 2. Include any relevant data you obtained from your research to support your main ideas. Ensure your data is obtained from a credible source. 3. Use in-text citations to reference any information you wish to present that is not your own original idea, such as data and theories/opinions of others. 4. Submit a reference list that includes all the sources you used in your research paper. Ensure that both your in-text citations and reference list are completed according to APA style . Assessment Details Your submission should include the following: ” Part I: Your outline for your paper, including your thesis and three main points ” ” ” Part I: Three sources you intend to use to write your research paper Part II: Your research paper Part II: Your complete reference list in APA style Upload your outline and three sources you intend to use to the Assignment: Ecological Footprint—Outline Dropbox. Upload your research paper to the Assignment: Ecological Footprint— Final Dropbox. * Please note that this assignment contains two unique Dropbox folders. Submit components of Part I to the Outline Dropbox, whereas components of Part II should be submitted to the Final Dropbox. https://lms.virtualhighschool.com/content/vhs3/departments/sci/co…?d2lSessionVal=LIIX3NmNrvZaSpKany6scCwO1&ou=64871&d2l_body_type=3 Page 3 of 4 Assignment: Ecological Footprint 2022-06-09, 12:05 PM Resources # Opinion Essay Structure Submit this assignment to the dropbox. This assignment will be evaluated for a grade that will contribute to your overall final grade in this course. https://lms.virtualhighschool.com/content/vhs3/departments/sci/co…?d2lSessionVal=LIIX3NmNrvZaSpKany6scCwO1&ou=64871&d2l_body_type=3 Page 4 of 4

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100