Time Management Discussion

  • Post category:Nursing
  • Reading time:8 mins read
  • Post author:

Time Management Discussion

Description

Nursing homework help

 

REQUIREMENTS:

Please note that each and every assignment has its own word limit.

In this assignment there are two parts in the attached worksheet to complete. The first is a time log in which you will monitor and write down all that you do within a 3-day time period. In the second part of the worksheet you will reflect on your completed time log from part 1 and write a short 250-500 word summary of your experience.

Part 1: Monitor your time in hourly increments.

1.Use the time monitoring log provided in the worksheet to write down what you did each hour of the day, starting at 5 a.m. and ending at 10 p.m. Even if you do not get up until 10 a.m., you still need to record 5 a.m. – 9 a.m. as “sleep.”

2.Do not overdo the recording; record the primary activity for the hour. At most, record two activities per hour.

Part 2: Reflection

On day four, review your completed time monitoring log from Part 1 of the worksheet in order to take a serious look at how you use your time each day.   Use the questions in the instructions for part 2 to guide your writing.

Discussion should be 250 to 500 words with at least three references…. MULTIPLE USE OF INTEXT CITATION AND PAGE NUMBER.  (The List of References should not be included in the word count.)

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.

It is important that you cover all the topics identified in the assignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUT presenting an explanation from the context of ethics and the readings for this class

Time Monitoring Worksheet

Complete both parts of this worksheet as instructed.

Part 1: Use the COMPLETED table below the do part 2

 

Time

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

 

5   a.m.

SLEEP

EXERCISE

EXERCISE AND BREAKFAST

 

6   a.m.

SHOWER AND TRAVEL

REST AND BREAKFAST

SHOWERED

 

7   a.m.

ARRIVE AT THE OFFICE

SHOWER

TRAVEL

 

8   a.m.

RESPOND TO EMAILS

HEAD OUT FOR WORK

WRITE REPORTS

 

9   a.m.

WRITE REPORTS

CONDUCT AN INSPECTION

CONDUCT AN INSPECTION

 

10   a.m.

WRITE REPORTS

TRAVEL

TRAVEL

 

11   a.m.

MAKE WEEKLY SCHEDULE

CONDUCT AN INSPECTION

CONDUCT AN INSPECTION

 

12   p.m.

LUNCH

LUNCH

LUNCH

 

1   p.m.

TRAVEL

TRAVEL

TRAVEL

 

2   p.m.

CONDUCT AN INSPECTION

CONDUCT AN INSPECTION

CONDUCT AN INSPECTION

 

3   p.m.

CONDUCT AN INSPECTION

CONDUCT AN INSPECTION

CONDUCT AN INSPECTION

 

4   p.m.

TRAVEL

TRAVEL

TRAVEL

 

5   p.m.

CONDUCT AN INSPECTION

CONDUCT AN INSPECTION

CONDUCT AN INSPECTION

 

6   p.m.

DINNER AND SHOWER

DINNER AND SHOWER

DINNER AND SHOWER

 

7   p.m.

SCHOOL ASSIGNMENT

SCHOOL ASSIGNMENT

SCHOOL ASSIGNMENT

 

8   p.m.

SCHOOL ASSIGNMENT

SCHOOL ASSIGNMENT

SCHOOL ASSIGNMENT

 

9   p.m.

SCHOOL ASSIGNMENT

SCHOOL ASSIGNMENT

SCHOOL ASSIGNMENT

 

10   p.m.

SCHOOL ASSIGNMENT

SCHOOL ASSIGNMENT

SCHOOL ASSIGNMENT

Part 2: Reflection

On day four, review your completed time monitoring log in order to take a serious look at how you use your time each day.

Write a 250 – 500 word reflection below on how you manage your time. Include the following in your reflection:

What are some things you can do more      efficiently?

What are the main items/tasks that take up      most of your time?

Do you see areas in your      daily routine where you can make adjustments to become more productive?

Do you have any “black      holes” that unnecessarily suck up a lot of your time?

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100