PSY100 CSU Outdoor Exercise Better at Reducing Stress, a New Study Suggests Analysis

  • Post category:Nursing
  • Reading time:7 mins read
  • Post author:

PSY100 CSU Outdoor Exercise Better at Reducing Stress, a New Study Suggests Analysis

Nursing homework help

PSY100 Rahm-Knigge Evaluating a Claim about Behavior: Stage 2 Worth 40 points Due Monday, 10/21/19 11:59pm In this assignment, you will use the skills you have developed and knowledge of research methods to write a response to the editor of the publication. Similar to Writing Assignment 1, you will explain whether psychologists would or would not believe the claim made. To do this, you will first identify the type of research that was presented. Then, you will evaluate the credibility of the claim by discussing 3 research criteria relevant to the type of research that was presented. You can include research criteria presented in the popular press article and/or research criteria that should have been included. For this assignment, please read the popular press article posted to Canvas. We will explore the academic journal article associated with this article in future assignments. The overall goal of this assignment is to demonstrate that you can apply course material to be a critical consumer of research. The corresponding Course Goal is: • PSY100 students will critically evaluate research from diverse sources. Audience: • You are writing this paper for the editor of the popular press source that published the article you selected. For the purposes of this assignment, pretend that your WGTA is the editor, since they selected the article for you to read. Due Date and Submission Guidelines: • This paper must be submitted via Canvas by the date and time indicated on the syllabus. 20% of the total possible points will be deducted per 24 hours submitted late. • Your paper should be typed, double-spaced, Times New Roman size 12 font, with 1-inch margins. • Your response should be 2-3 pages long. You will not be penalized if it is longer. • So other professionals in Psychology can find your source article and so the editor you are writing to knows which article you are evaluating, please cite the article throughout your response in APA format. Helpful Resources: • Module 2 of your text • Module 2 Lecture • Document on APA Style in PSY100 (in the Stage 2 Writing Assignment module) • CSU Writing Center: http://writing.colostate.edu

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100