Personal Care Home Visit Reflection Paper

  • Post category:Nursing
  • Reading time:8 mins read
  • Post author:

Personal Care Home Visit Reflection Paper

Nursing homework help

Employees Nurses, Health Care Aides, Health Unit clerk, social workers, volunteers, pastors, rabbis, pets, dietitian (twice a week), social worker Nurses we’re in charge of each unit. 5 to 25 staff to resident Seems to be adequate It varies by care Most of the staff were very friendly, cooperative, informative, quite happy. Individualized Care . . O Knocking the door and introducing themselves Very respectectful for their privacy There was plenty of considerations for many religious services Yes plenty of flexibility in the routines. Pretty much treated the same some routines are adjusted to suit their impairment. There is a constant staff to deal with resident with difficult behavious They use restraints but very rarely (special cases) They have a dedicated dementia care staff P.I.E.C.E.S training. . Menus Lentil soup, Beef Stragnoff, egg noodles, zucchini, fresh fruit. Sweet and sour meatball, rice pilaf, mixed oriental veggies and ice cream. It’s varied and looks quite nutritious. It varies by dietitian order Yes the PCH accommodate special dietary needs according to religion, taste and dietitian Yes they are flexible they can eat when they feel according to time Yes snacking is possible. . Activities . . . . Bowling, bingo, karaoke, perform music, plenty of games, tv, books, lots of stuff. 7 days a week usually after lunch. Yes they have activities for residents who are hearing of visually impaired Board, schedule, volunteer usually ask. Plenty of places to socialize like dining areas, lounge and garden. Yes plenty of flexibility multiple activities done at the same time. 7 days a week until 8pm Plenty of opportunities for residents to go on outings Antique car shows, petting zoos, BBQ, Yes there is a pet program Winnipeg humane society bring in pet for seniors. . . . Safety Yes plenty of lighting and plenty of sunlight. There are smoke dectectors, fire alarms and fire suppressors Yes there are slip proof mats and grab bars Floor are usually light colors, and wall colours are depenedent on the wing. Floors and chairs are darker brown and easily distinguished from the walls and floors Yes they use very large font and use pictures . . O Medical Care Dietitian visit twice a week Dentist as needed Foot clinic as needed Occupational Thereapist 1-1.5 days a week Trained staff for emergency Dedicated team . Reflection Personal Care Home Visit Outline Intro . . O Rent is paid 15 month Rate range is from $36.40 – $85.00 Based on net income Yes there is a waiting list. Maximum 18 people on the waiting list New resident every month Location . . . . . . . 1275 Burrows Avenue. PCH located on a major route Plenty of places to walk There is about 3 bus stops right next to the care home Plenty of parking. Neighbourhood is generally quiet, plenty of greenspace Quite easy to get to. Physical Set-up Each room has a name plate outside. Bedroom varies by location and price. They had photo, television, nicely decorated, religious symbols, personal telephone. Can bring their own furniture no cloth upholstered Plenty of privacy they don’t share rooms. Yes the bathrooms are attached to the bedrooms Yes the bathrooms are private They even have a spa area. Every floor has a dining area and dayroom. Main dining area and dayroom is located on the main floor near the entrance. The outside of most room window lead to a garden. The noise level is usually very low Appearance Yes the appearance is visually pleasing. Fireplace, photos, very seasonal decorations, piano, chapel had a stain glass window. Yes there we’re very clean. Not very cluttered. It’s very lived in. Floor very cleaned and washrooms were very clean. Smell clean and dining area smell like freshly cooked meals . . . O . . . . . Residents Some of the residents we’re very quiet and some were quite happy in the activity areas

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100