Northwestern State University of Louisiana CO Corruption Discussion Paper

  • Post category:Nursing
  • Reading time:7 mins read
  • Post author:

Northwestern State University of Louisiana CO Corruption Discussion Paper

Nursing homework help

RESEARCH AND PRACTICE Best-Practice Physical Activity Programs for Older Adults: Findings From the National Impact Study I Susan L. Hughes, DSW, Rachel B. Seymour, PhD, Richard T. Campbell, PhD, Nancy Whitelaw, PhD, and Terry Bazzarre, PhD Moderate exercise 3 to 5 times per week for at least 30 minutes produces multiple health benefits for older adults at most levels of functional ability.’ However, older adults are tbe most sedentary population in the United States,^” witb more tban 60% failing to participate in regular physical activity.’* A number of randomized controlled trials have tested specific exercise programs for older adults. To our knowledge, Wilcox et al. is tbe only study that has examined tbe impact of evidence-based programs adopted by community providers of pbysical activity programs for older adults.^ Tbis study found that older adults who participated in 2 newly adopted programs experienced statistically significant benefits regarding pbysical activity partidpation, depression, stress, and body mass index. However, that study did not examine the impact of exerdse programs already existing in tbe community. We sought to address tbis gap witb our study. Community organizations like senior centers and YMCAs are tbe primary providers of pbysical activity programs for older adults in tbe United States. Tbese providers strive to acbieve a balance among tbe programs tbey offer, taking into consideration such factors as exercise science, older adults’ preferences, and real-world feasibility. In 2003, tbe Center for Healthy Aging of tbe National Council on Aging (NCOA) conducted a national competition to identify 10 best-practice physical activity programs operated by community organizations serving older adults. The competition was funded by tbe Robert Wood Jobnson Foundation and was conducted in collaboration witb tbe Center for Researcb on Healtb and Aging (CRHA) at tbe University of Illinois at Cbicago. Tbe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Healtby Aging Researcb Network, the Active Aging Partnersbip, and nationally known pbysical activity experts belped NCOA develop best-practice criteria based on findings from the literature and expert judgment. Objectives. We assessed the impact of existing best-practice physical activity programs for older adults on physical activity participation and healtb-related outcomes. Methods. We used a multisite, randomized trial with 544 older adults (mean age 66 years) and measures at baseline, 5, and 10 montbs to test tbe impact of a multiple-component pbysical activity program compared witb results for a control group tbat did not participate in sucb a program. Resuits. For adults wbo participated in a multiple-component physical activity program, we found statistically significant benefits at 5 and 10 montbs with regard to self-efficacy for exercise adberence over time (P

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100