Liberty University ePatient Engagement Concept Map

  • Post category:Nursing
  • Reading time:7 mins read
  • Post author:

Liberty University ePatient Engagement Concept Map

Nursing homework help

DELIVERABLES CRITERIA AND RUBRIC Overview:

Healthcare organizations now offer internet resources for potential and current patients in the form of education, support groups, social media, links to a patient portal and other Web 3.0/Health 3.0 applications. The advent of mobile health devices and mHealth applications provides opportunities for patient generated data collection both internal and external to hospitals and other patient care facilities. • • • • • Explore e-patient engagement activities in your organization or applicable to your practice area. Critique strengths/weaknesses of patient engagement technologies to include application of the DIKW model. Investigate a variety of medical devices in your patient care setting, what they do, the purpose, how they work, and the D-I-K-W that is generated. Examine use of social media in your organization to include type of Web 3.0/Health 3.0 tools available, how this technology is used to engage patients, and what data/information may or could be collected. Critique patient portal use in your organization (if applicable) to include how patients gain access, available functions/resources, and utilization statistics. Practicum Activity 3: Critique e-Patient engagement Identify a minimum of three (3) e-patient engagement technologies utilized by your organization. 5 Discuss the benefits and challenges related to using this technology from multiple perspectives (patient, provider, organization). 5 Total Possible Points • • • 3 Describe each engagement technology to include: 1) how it is used to engage patients; 2) specific features/functions; and 3) what data may or could be collected for patient care use Analyze the role of the DNP/APRN in leading change related to leveraging technology to engage consumers/patients. Organization, scholarly tone, current references (5-6 years), readability with moderate use of color, and innovative use of mind mapping features. • • Possible Points 5 2 20 For your Reference list – number your references then note that number next to the items in the map (do this for all Mind Maps). References should be numbered and listed together in a text box or comment field. 2. Follow the PD#2 rubric for the map themes Center concept is ePatient Engagement Direct line from center concept to three (3) different patient engagement technologies used at your practicum site Subcategories of each technology should include how it is used, features/functions & data that could be collected (should have references noted by number on your reference list) Benefits/Challenges with subcategories patient, provider, organization (should have references noted by number on reference list). Can do direct from center concept (all technologies) or a by each technology as a subcategory – your choice DNP Role-this can be a SHORT narrative in a text box, bullet points in float concept or bullet points from the center concept (should have references noted by number on reference

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100