HCAD 650 United Medical and Dental College Wk 2 Business Transactions Discussion

  • Post category:Nursing
  • Reading time:9 mins read
  • Post author:

HCAD 650 United Medical and Dental College Wk 2 Business Transactions Discussion

Description

 

Nursing homework help

Week 2 Discussions PowerPoint

Tips:

(1) Stop and Review as you watch the video

(2) Re-review the video before discussions:

(3) Download the PowerPoint to review discussion requirements before discussions.

(4) Complete all the questions.

Use only classroom materials to complete the discussion. This would include the textbooks, weblinks, the classroom law library, and compliance library.

Make sure to Read:The Tracks We Leave: Ethics and Management Dilemmas in Healthcare, Third Edition: Case Study, Chapter 10 – Failed Hospital Merger: Richland River Valley Healthcare Systems (pages 149 – 159)

In the Law of Health Care Administration, 9th Edition. Read:

Part 1:  Critical Analysis of the Law

  1. Evaluate the legal risks and consequences that can arise for failing to comply with laws that impact contracts.  Evaluate one of the following laws:
    • Certificate of Need
    • Antitrust
    • Corporate Practice of Medicine (CPOM)
  2. Evaluate one of the contract clauses from the list below.  For the  clause selected indicate the type of risk it will mitigate and how you would use the contract clause as a  risk mitigation tool.
    • Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) clauses
    • Limitation of Liability clause
    • Periodic Reporting and Right to Audit
    • Termination clauses
    • Legal Compliance clause
    • Data Protection Clause
    • Insurance requirement to cover liability
  3. How would a comprehensive cloud-based contract management system limit contract risk?   How would a comprehensive contract management system prevent the problems in The Tracks We Leave, Chapter 10 Failed Hospital Merger: Richland River Valley Healthcare System? Be specific and demonstrate understanding of the risks and how the compliance tool can be used specifically to control the risks.

Part 2:  Strategic Compliance with the Law

You are an administrator in a very busy clinic in the same managed care organization (MCO)  as the local hospital.  Five of your providers (Dollar Docs) regularly refer to a nearby home health agency the five own. The home health agency is the sole provider of home health services in a five-county area. The home health agency wants to expand and open more home health agencies in other counties and be the sole provider in those counties as well.  The home health agency is located in Maryland which requires a certificate of need for home health.  The home health agency would like to employ a physician.

  1. What laws (from the list in part 1) does this arrangement violate? Why? What are the consequences of the violation(s)?
  2. Create an action plan with three actions you could take to correct the problem including the specific compliance strategy selected.
  3. eBook UMGC Library Permalink: http://ezproxy.umgc.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=2344970&site=eds-live&scope=site&profile=edsebook
  4. In the Law of Health Care Administration, 9th Edition. Read:Ch. 5 Contracts (pages. 175-189)Ch 13 Competition and Antitrust Law (pages 489 – 523)eBook UMGC Library Permalink: http://ezproxy.umgc.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=2361947&site=eds-live&scope=site&profile=edsebook
  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100