Debate assignment

  • Post category:Nursing
  • Reading time:9 mins read
  • Post author:

Debate assignment

Nursing homework help

Instructions

Each group has been assigned to debate one side of an issue. Each group will have 10 minutes to present their assigned position on the issue. After each group presents their issue, each group will be given 5 minutes to provide a rebuttal, so be prepared with specific points and possible counter-points for your position. At the end, there will also be 5 minutes for questions from the audience. Grading In order to receive credit for this activity: • One group member from each group must submit a 1-page document to Canvas outlining the position the group has taken and supporting points. This can be done in a bulleted list format. Be sure to cite your sources in APA format. Deadline for submission is by 9am on the day of the debate. Tobic: Is it ethical to collect public health surveillance data from us (citizens and people) without our permission? The answer of this question for my group is (YES). So all of your responses, reasons, citations..etc should support this answer. Debate Rubric Debate Rubric Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehension Ratings 3.0 pts Group demonstrates complete understanding of assigned issue. 2.0 pts Group demonstrates some understanding of assigned issue. 1.0 pts Group demonstr understanding o Debate Rubric Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of evidence This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRebuttal This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePreparation: Outline Ratings 3.0 pts Group uses credible sources and supports all arguments with evidence-based research. 2.0 pts Group uses some credible sources and supports some arguments with evidence-based research. 3.0 pts Group discusses counter arguments on outline and is prepared to use them during question and answer session. 3.0 pts All group members convincingly deliver their case (with respect to others, proper tone of voice, and enthusiasm) 3.0 pts Outline is submitted on Canvas by beginning of class, is clear, organized, & cited where necessary 2.0 pts Group presents some effective counter arguments 2.0 pts All group members verbally participate in class debate. 2.0 pts Outline is submitted on Canvas by beginning of class. Total Points: 15.0 support the answer of the question which is YES and come up with citations, thoughts, responses..etc. please do not forget to put the references based on the APA format. please read the word documents carefully and I am here if you have a question. 1.0 pts Group uses few supports few ar evidence-based 1.0 pts Group p effective argume 1.0 pts Some grou verbally p debate. 1.0 pts Outline is no Canvas befor class. Debate assignment It is ethical for the government to collect data from its people since the data is used to keep civilians safe and to thwart efforts by terror groups to disrupt public peace. According to Cayford, & Pieters, (2018), surveillance technologies such as the CCTV cameras, drones, data mining, phone tapping and social media surveillance are effective in identifying potential terrorists before they execute their attacks on the people. Over the past decade, terrorist groups such as the Islamic states have increased their presence in middle east countries and even deployed their agents into the Mainland US. If such groups are allowed to operate freely, they might cause havoc, loss of lives and destruction of properties worth Billions of dollars. It is through surveillance that the government can identify terrors activities, and thwart efforts by terror groups to plan and execute attacks. The Government also collects data from its citizens for the purposes of crime prevention, and identification. Such an approach is ethical since it seeks to promote the good of the entire public by ensuring that criminals are identified or deterred. According to Lindegaard & Bernasco (2018), surveillance technologies such as CCTV cameras have been effective in identifying criminals, and ensuring that they are easily identified. Further, real-time CCTV cameras have been effective in preventing crimes, and their impacts since law enforcement officers can intervene before an actual crime takes place. Further, phone tapping and social media surveillance techniques are used to identify online fraudsters, and to protect the public from online crime. For instance, government agencies can conduct surveillance on a suspected criminal, ensuring that public order is maintained. It is ethical for the government to collect data from the people since it does not use such data to harm its people. According to Berg, (2018), law-abiding citizens should not worry about data collection and surveillance, since they have nothing to hide or be afraid of. For instance, most of the times, the government uses the data collected through surveillance for its planning purposes, crime deterrence and prosecution purposes. As such, an average citizen should not be worried by these efforts if there is nothing to hide. Further, checks and balances are in place in addition to intelligence oversight, which means that a citizen cannot be detained if you are on the right side despite the existence of specific claims of conspiracy theories. References Berg, C. (2018). Privacy and the State. In The Classical Liberal Case for Privacy in a World of Surveillance and Technological Change (pp. 131-152). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Cayford, M., & Pieters, W. (2018). The effectiveness of surveillance technology: What intelligence officials are saying. The Information Society, 34(2), 88-103. Lindegaard, M. R., & Bernasco, W. (2018). Lessons learned from crime caught on camera. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 55(1), 155-186.

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100