Bob Marley Research Paper

  • Post category:Nursing
  • Reading time:9 mins read
  • Post author:

Bob Marley Research Paper

Description

Nursing homework help

 

CELEBRITY: Bob Marley

DISEASE: Acral Lentiginous Melanoma Disease

The first part should be about the disease in general and the rest on how it effected the celebrity BOB MARLEY and others who have it

Celebrity Paper Assignment and Rubric

You must select one celebrity who has been diagnosed with a chronic illness. ALL SELECTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE INSTRUCTOR so celebrities are not duplicated. You must describe how the celebrity’s life has changed being diagnosed with their particular disease.

THE ILLNESS OF BOB MARLEY Details Name Institutional Affiliation 1

Introduction

❑Bob Marley was a Jamaican songwriter and artist (Tomczak, 2018). ❑Bob Marley was born in 6th February 1945 and died on 11th May 1981. ❑Bob Marley was a prolific musician and was loved. ❑The death of Bob Marley shocked many people. ❑The following is an analysis of the illness of Bob Marley: Bob Marley and Cancer ❑Bob Marley was diagnosed of Cancer in later days of his life (Tomczak, 2018). ❑Cancer is a disease caused by a change in the structure of DNA. ❑Bob Marley was diagnosed of acral lentiginous melanoma disease. ❑As a result of prolific smoking, Bob Marley developed lung cancer (Teramoto et al., 2018). ❑The change in the cellular DNA results in the alterations of normal morphology. ❑Cancer was the major challenge which impacted health. Risk Factors which led to Bob-Marley’s cancer ❑Cancer is caused by various lifestyle factors. ❑For Bob Marley, the disease was caused by the following: ➢Excessive smoking (Tomczak, 2018). ➢Heavy drinking. ➢Harsh settings especially in music career. ➢Dietary factors which increased the exposure. ➢The chemicals used. ➢Genetic factors. ➢Race. Pathophysiology of Acral Lentiginous Melanoma Disease ❑The melanoma is a skin cancer which arises from melanocytes (Teramoto et al., 2018). ❑The melanoma affects the skin since it alters the normal skin morphology. ❑The disease causes changes in the skin color and adversely. ❑The disease gets worse for effects the normal cells. ❑Comprehensively, the disease affects the body adversely. ❑The condition causes bruises and other challenges which effects quality of health. ❑The skin of the individuals are affected and causes adverse. ❑The skin changes result in looseness and other challenges. ❑The melanoma impacts the quality of the skin and changes the integrity. ❑Adversity results in the challenges which led to the death of bob Marley. Acral Lentiginous Melanoma Disease The Clinical Manifestations ❑Pain. ❑Change in the skin pigmentation (Raub, 2017). ❑Itchiness. ❑Redness. ❑Adverse skin reactions. ❑Bruising. A description of How Bob Marley was affected ❑The disease reduced the lifestyle comfort of Bob Marley (Matnei et al., 2017). ❑The adversity resulted in the poor health conditions. ❑Bob Marley could not continue with music due to compromised health status. ❑A change in the emotional status. ❑Reduced body weight. ❑Altered fluid balance. Attempts to manage the condition ❑Acral Lentiginous Melanoma Disease which affected Bob Marley was managed as per the guidelines (Goydos, & Shoen, 2016). ❑Bob Marley attended medical clinics. ❑The approaches which Bob Marley applied did not succeed. ❑The cancer compromised most of the systems and resulted in the loss of senses. ❑Severity of the condition resulted in the observed condition and complication. Video of Bob Marley in Last Days with cancer Conclusion ❑Bob Marley died of Acral Lentiginous Melanoma Disease. ❑The disease is a cancer of the skin affecting the melanocytes. ❑The adverse effects of the disease resulted in poor quality life. ❑Poor approaches limited the required lifestyle adaptive measures. ❑Bob Marley succumbed as a result of the complications. References • Goydos, J. S., & Shoen, S. L. (2016). Acral lentiginous melanoma. In Melanoma (pp. 321-329). Springer, Cham. • Matnei, T., Camargo, C. H. F., Feltrin, F., Wambier, C. G., & Baroni, E. D. R. V. (2017). Bob marley’s disease: cerebral metastasis of acral melanoma. Revista Brasileira de Neurologia, 53(1). • Raub, J. N. (2017). A life undefined by cancer. American Journal of HealthSystem Pharmacy, 74(12), 938-940. • Teramoto, Y., Keim, U., Gesierich, A., Schuler, G., Fiedler, E., Tüting, T., … & Goerdt, S. (2018). Acral lentiginous melanoma: a skin cancer with unfavourable prognostic features. A study of the German central malignant melanoma registry (CMMR) in 2050 patients. British Journal of Dermatology, 178(2), 443-451. • Tomczak, A. M. (2018). Remembering Marley: a portrayal of the reggae superstar in Marlon James’s A Brief History of Seven Killings. Brno studies in English, 44(1).

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100