BHA 3202 CSU Health & Medical Stress Management Essay

  • Post category:Nursing
  • Reading time:9 mins read
  • Post author:

BHA 3202 CSU Health & Medical Stress Management Essay

Description

 

Nursing homework help

write an essay that compares and contrasts creative and critical thinking as used in a stressful situation. Consider their application and effect as applied to a stressful situation of your choosing that a healthcare administrator might encounter. This may be an actual situation from your experience or a hypothetical situation. Keep the points below in mind as you construct your essay.

  • Clearly identify the stress and its effects in your chosen situation.
  • Your essay should do more than just state similarities and differences. It should also evaluate their significance and impact as well as offer a clear analysis of the types of thinking that should be applied in the situation you chose.
  • It should be organized logically with clear claims of similarities and differences and provide adequate levels of detail and description to support your analysis.

Stress is something we all have to deal with on some sort of platform. Work stress is more often them not bad stress. In my opinion personal stress is divided in Good and bad. Stress in health care will always be there. Finding ways to deal with it and still producing good work takes time and practice. Using stress to learn and motivated is important in the field of health care. A stressful situation that a health care administrator may encounter is delivering news that a patient did not make it through a general surgery. The stress of handling news this devasting, can trigger personal experience. The health care provider delivering the news may have been on the opposite side before and is overwhelmed with empathy. Before approaching the family or next of kin all the information must be available to present the news to the loved ones. Knowing what to say is scary and nerve-racking. The stress that comes with this situation is when delivering the news, can you hold back emotions but also show sympathy but no to much empathy? The backlash you can get from a family who just lost a loved one wanting someone to blame is very fearful. Keeping a calm demeanor and only having sympathy can look as you do not care. Having too much empathy can come across as taking the blame. When My niece was born there were Nemours complications that we as a family felt were preventable. The doctors were very calm when explaining that she may not make it and had lost too much oxygen. My brother was enraged with anger and blamed the doctors. Moments later the head Nurse came with tears in her eyes told us all how sorry she was, and wished there was more she could have done. From the outside looking in we felt that as her acknowledging something wrong took place. Now looking back it may have just been empathy that she went thru something similar in her personal life. This stress of delivering bad news or unfortunate death can cause emotional and physical stress. One stress that is combine by both is mental health. It leads to poor mental health that breaks down to effecting physical health. One example is anxiety attack. Emotional in this situation is the obvious of tears and crying. Physical and emotional stress when combined can have a health care worker spiral to a mental health breakdown and feel over worked. Having to take time off for emotional stress happens a lot in health care. We like to call this as a calling out for a mental health day. Dealing with every day stress of getting to work on time. Planning for a vacation is good stress but can cause emotional stress till the trip is paid for and taken. When dealing with stress you need to find coping skills/ Having a good support system at work and at home is by far one of the most important factors. Getting enough sleep and balancing work and home life can affect the way stress takes over your emotions. Quality of sleep and balancing leisure time can keep stress at a low. Facing situations that put a health worker in a delivering news situation can never be perfection as every situation is different. Using a more lentamente approach to delivering news to one person is completely different when delivering to a group. Taking in age and relationship is a lot of stress to make sure everyone understands.

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100