2-3 Journal: Track Selection and Literature Review Practice

  • Post category:Nursing
  • Reading time:11 mins read
  • Post author:

2-3 Journal: Track Selection and Literature Review Practice

Nursing homework help

PSY 215 Tracks and Topics for Final Project

For the final project and for the upcoming assignments in Module Three and Module Five, you must choose one of three tracks in the study of abnormal psychology. The track you choose determines the studies you will use to review literature, find a research gap, and design a study for your final project. Do not worry if you are not familiar with the tracks at this point in the course; you will be learning much more about them throughout the term. Choose your track thoughtfully, however, as you will not be able to switch your track once chosen. Track One looks at the biological influences of abnormal behavior. Track Two focuses on the psychological influences on abnormal behavior. Track Three explores the sociocultural influences of abnormal behavior. Note: In this document, you are provided with three articles for each track, but you will need to find two additional articles to use for your final project. Track One: Biological Influences of Abnormal Behavior Track One topic and related articles: Biological and genetic contributions to the development of psychological disorders: Article: The Roles of Genes, Stress, and Dopamine in the Development of Schizophrenia Article: Can Marijuana Make It Better? Prospective Effects of Marijuana and Temperament on Risk for Anxiety and Depression Article: The Covariation of Trait Anger and Borderline Personality: A Bivariate Twin-Siblings Study Track Two: Psychological Influences of Abnormal Behavior Track Two topic and related articles: Psychological assessments and therapies: Article: The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Psychological Treatments for Mood, Anxiety, and Related Disorders Article: Cognitive Processing Therapy for Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Comparison Between Outpatient and Residential Treatment Article: Stressful Life Events in Bipolar I and II Disorder: Cause or Consequence of Mood Symptoms? Track Three: Sociocultural Influences of Abnormal Behavior Track Three topic and related articles: Social and cultural contributions to the development of psychological disorders: Article: Difference or Disorder? Cultural Issues in Understanding Neurodevelopmental Disorders Article: The Expression of Depression in Asian Americans and European Americans Article: The Relative Impact of Socioeconomic Status and Childhood Trauma on Black-White Differences in Paranoid Personality Disorder Symptoms PSY 215 Module Two Journal Guidelines and Rubric For this journal task, you will first select one of three tracks in the study of abnormal psychology (biological, psychological, or sociocultural), on which you will focus your final project research investigation. Next, you will analyze one of the articles within the track, which will provide practice for your literature review. Prompt: First, refer to the Tracks and Topics for the Final Project document and select a track that you would like to focus your final project on. (Note: In this document, you are provided with three articles for each topic, but you will need to find two additional articles to use for your final project.) Choose your track thoughtfully, as you will not be able to switch your track once chosen. Do not worry if you are not familiar with the tracks at this point in the course; you will be learning much more about them throughout the term. Please be sure to contact your instructor if you are having any trouble choosing your track. Review this tutorial to help you with the Track and Topic Selection Process. Next, analyze one of the articles within the tracks which, will provide practice for your literature review. When you complete your literature review, you will be addressing more specific elements. These questions are the first thing to think about when beginning a literature review. Keep in mind that these questions are practice and preparation for the more detailed literature review elements to come. In your journal assignment, answer the following questions about the article:         What is the title of the article? Provide the reference for the article in proper APA format. What is the purpose of the article? What is the hypothesis of the study? In other words, what claims do the authors make in the article? What variables (factors) are being looked at as an influence on abnormal behavior? If these variables or the relationship between these variables have been studied before, what does the article indicate about the findings of previous studies? This shows historical significance. Describe the type of research design that was used in the study. Do you think the research in this article was conducted in an ethical manner? Why or why not? What was the outcome(s) of the study, that is, the conclusions that the authors made as a result of the study? Each question requires an answer in one to three sentences, although you can write more if needed. This should result in a journal assignment that is around 1 page in length. Be sure to cite directly from the article to support your answers. Please refer to the Online Tutoring Service tutorials to assist you in your writing and to the Research & Citations page on the SNHU Online Writing Center website for proper APA formatting of sources. Guidelines for Submission: Submit assignment as a Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins Rubric Critical Elements Article: Title (APA) Proficient (100%) Provides title and the reference for the article in proper APA format Article: Purpose Describes the purpose of the article Claims Description identifies the claims the authors make in the article Variables Description identifies the variables (factors) that are being looked at as an influence on abnormal behavior Historical Significance Describes the historical significance of previous studies Research Design Describes the research design that is used in the study Ethics Outcome(s)/ Conclusions Describes whether or not the research in the article was conducted in an ethical manner Describes the outcome(s)/ conclusions that the authors made as a result of the study Needs Improvement (70%) Provides title, but does not provide the reference for the article in proper APA format Describes the article, but does not sufficiently describe the purpose of the article Description does not sufficiently identify the claims the authors make in the article Description does not sufficiently identify the variables (factors) that are being looked at as an influence on abnormal behavior Describes the historical significance of previous studies, but description is not relevant to the current variables under consideration Describes the research design that is used in the study, but description is lacking in detail Describes whether or not the research in the article was conducted in an ethical manner, but does not sufficiently defend stance Describes the outcome(s)/ conclusions that the authors made as a result of the study, but description is cursory or lacking in detail Not Evident (0%) Title and APA reference not provided Value 12 Description not provided 12 Description not provided 12 Description not provided 12 Description not provided 12 Description not provided 12 Description not provided 12 Description not provided 12 Articulation of Response Journal assignment is free of errors in organization and grammar Journal assignment contains errors of organization and grammar, but errors are limited enough so that assignment can be understood Journal assignment contains errors of organization and grammar making the assignment difficult to understand Total 4 100%

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100